From c5befd3f7da4c63b5ef1abdd2d0d502d981256b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Grisel-Davy <grisel-davy@crans.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 15:04:20 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] deblayage

---
 DSD/qrs/IEEEconf.cls |  2 +-
 DSD/qrs/main.tex     | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/DSD/qrs/IEEEconf.cls b/DSD/qrs/IEEEconf.cls
index 097b2ab..79715fc 100644
--- a/DSD/qrs/IEEEconf.cls
+++ b/DSD/qrs/IEEEconf.cls
@@ -4925,4 +4925,4 @@ Use \@IEEEbackslash #2 instead.}}
 \endinput
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of IEEEconf.cls  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-% That's all folks!
\ No newline at end of file
+% That's all folks!
diff --git a/DSD/qrs/main.tex b/DSD/qrs/main.tex
index fe6b607..9679c08 100644
--- a/DSD/qrs/main.tex
+++ b/DSD/qrs/main.tex
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
     \normalsize *corresponding author
 }
 
+
 %+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
 % use only for invited papers
@@ -53,11 +54,11 @@ Enabling the definition and enforcement of high-level security policies requires
 We present in this paper a novel time series, one-shot classifier called \gls{mad} specifically designed and evaluated for side-channel analysis.
 \gls{mad} outperforms other traditional state detection solutions in terms of accuracy and, as importantly, Levenshtein distance of the state sequence.
 \end{abstract}
-\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts
-\vspace{1.5ex}
-\begin{keywords}
-\itshape component; formatting; style; styling; insert (key words)
-\end{keywords}
+%\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts
+%\vspace{1.5ex}
+%\begin{keywords}
+%\itshape component; formatting; style; styling; insert (key words)
+%\end{keywords}
 % no keywords
 
 % For peer review papers, you can put extra information on the cover
@@ -193,7 +194,6 @@ The pattern $\lambda$ is the \textit{unknown} pattern assigned to the samples in
 \label{fig:overview}
 \end{figure}
 
-\pagebreak
 \section{Proposed Solution: MAD}\label{sec:solution}
 \gls{mad}'s core idea separates it from other traditional sliding window algorithm.
 In \gls{mad}, the sample window around the sample to classify dynamically adapts for optimal context selection.
@@ -383,8 +383,18 @@ The lower the value of $\alpha$, the smaller the areas of attraction around each
 Applying a coefficient to the thresholds produces a reduction of the radius of the area of attraction, not an homothety of the initial areas.
 In other words, the shrink does not preserve the shape of the area.
 For a value $\alpha < 0.5$, all areas become disks --- in the 2D representation --- and all shape information are lost.
+Figure~\ref{fig:areas} illustrate the areas of capture around the patterns for different values of $\alpha$. 
 
-The impact of the $\alpha$ coefficient on the classification is monotonic and predictable.
+\begin{figure}
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{images/areas.pdf}
+\caption{2D visualization of the areas of capture around each pattern as $\alpha$ changes. When $\alpha \ggg 2$, the areas of capture tends to equal these of a classic \gls{1nn}.}
+\label{fig:areas}
+\end{figure}
+\agd{Increase font size}
+
+
+The influence of the $\alpha$ coefficient on the classification is monotonic and predictable.
 Because $\alpha$ influences the thresholds, changing $\alpha$ results in moving the transitions in the detected labels.
 In other words, a lower value of $\alpha$ expands the unknown segments while a higher value shrinks them until they disappear.
 Figure~\ref{fig:alpha_impact} illustrates the impact $\alpha$ on the width of unknown segments.
@@ -429,7 +439,6 @@ Figure~\ref{fig:alpha} presents the number of unknown samples in the classificat
 \end{figure}
 
 
-\pagebreak
 \section{Case Study 1: Comparison with Other Methods}
 The first evaluation of \gls{mad} consists in the detection of the states for time series from various machines.
 We evaluate the performance of the proposed solution against other traditional methods to illustrate the capabilities and advantages of \gls{mad}.
@@ -566,14 +575,7 @@ With both performances metrics combined, \gls{mad} outperforms the other methods
 \end{figure*}
 
 
-\begin{figure*}
-\centering
-\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/areas.pdf}
-\caption{2D visualization of the areas of capture around each pattern as $\alpha$ changes. When $\alpha \ggg 2$, the areas of capture tends to equal these of a classic \gls{1nn}.}
-\label{fig:areas}
-\end{figure*}
 
-\pagebreak
 \section{Case Study 2: Attack Scenarios}
 
 \section{Discussion}\label{sec:discussion}